R. Gamba
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 11
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 5
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 3
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 3
-
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 2
- Journals
- Physical review. D (5 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (3 papers)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
R. Gamba
11 papers receiving 714 citations
R. Gamba's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 697
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 152
- Oceanography 133
- Geophysics 79
- Instrumentation 7
Countries citing papers authored by R. Gamba
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Gamba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Gamba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Gamba more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Gamba
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Gamba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Gamba. The network helps show where R. Gamba may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 194 |
| 2 | Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO–Virgo Observing Run Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 149 |
| 3 | 2021 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 79 | |
| 5 | Tests of general relativity with GWTC-3 Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 60 |
| 6 | 2024 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 8 |
About R. Gamba
R. Gamba is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Oceanography, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (11 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (3 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (2 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper) and Geophysics and Sensor Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (697 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (152 citations), Oceanography (133 citations), Geophysics (79 citations) and Instrumentation (7 citations). R. Gamba has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Physical Review Letters and University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.