Q. Peng

777 citations
27 papers · 488 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Q. Peng

25 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Q. Peng
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 369
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 164
  • Information Systems and Management 32
  • Computer Networks and Communications 103
  • Aerospace Engineering 103
Replace D. P. Schissel with:
D. P. Schissel United States
B. Guillerminet France
M. Zilker Germany
W. H. Miner United States
M. Emoto Japan
Anders Wallander France
J. L. V. Lewandowski United States
Svetlana Shasharina United States
J.B. Lister Switzerland
J.M. Park United States
Q. Peng relative to D. P. Schissel United States D. P. Schissel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
D. P. Schissel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Q. Peng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q. Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q. Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q. Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q. Peng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q. Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q. Peng. The network helps show where Q. Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Q. Peng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Q. Peng Line = papers co-authored together Q. Peng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005256
2 200636
3 200231
4 201323
5 200020
6 200416
7 200414
8 200412
9 201311
10 20149
11 20019
12 20157
13 20027
14 20136
15 20046
16 20005
17 20065
18 20034
19 20052
20
SOA and Quality
20082

About Q. Peng

Q. Peng is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Data Storage Technologies (14 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (14 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (11 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (369 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (164 citations), Information Systems and Management (32 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (103 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (103 citations). Q. Peng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include L. L. Lao, William H. Meyer, C. Zhang, K.-I. You, H.E. St. John, T. S. Taylor, E. J. Strait, J.R. Ferron, D. P. Schissel and J. Schachter. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Fusion Science & Technology and Future Generation Computer Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact