Philip Thacker

1.5k citations
42 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
    • Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
    • Meat and Animal Product Quality
    • Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities

Papers in

Philip Thacker

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Philip Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Animal Science and Zoology 548
  • Microbiology 179
  • Small Animals 143
  • Aquatic Science 135
  • Food Science 231
Replace Yeong-Hsiang Cheng with:
Yeong-Hsiang Cheng Taiwan
I.K. Kwon South Korea
M. R. Reddy India
Elizabeth Santín Brazil
A.P. McElroy United States
Hongbo Yi China
B. A. Rotter Canada
K. Ghareeb Austria
J. Brufau Spain
Philip Thacker relative to Yeong-Hsiang Cheng Taiwan Yeong-Hsiang Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Yeong-Hsiang Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Thacker. The network helps show where Philip Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Thacker Line = papers co-authored together Philip Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013226
2 2012145
3 2013128
4 201778
5 200756
6 201251
7 201243
8 201540
9 201539
10 200029
11 201827
12 201626
13 201225
14 201025
15 201224
16 200822
17 201222
18 201020
19 201120
20 201419

About Philip Thacker

Philip Thacker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Small Animals and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (22 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (548 citations), Microbiology (179 citations), Small Animals (143 citations), Aquatic Science (135 citations) and Food Science (231 citations). Philip Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include G.P. Widyaratne, Shiyan Qiao, Xiangfang Zeng, Shihai Zhang, Shiyan Qiao, J. J. McKinnon, Jiang Zhang, Zhimin Huang, Guoyao Wu and Xi Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Archives of Animal Nutrition, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology and Current Protein and Peptide Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact