Peter T. Schmidt
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 0.5%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
-
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Papers in
- Surgery 35
- Diverticular Disease and Complications 10
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis 7
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 11
- Co-authors
- Jens J. Holst (28 shared papers)Per M. Hellström (17 shared papers)Erik Näslund (10 shared papers)Per Grybäck (7 shared papers)Michael A. Riegler (11 shared papers)Sigrun Losada Eskeland (10 shared papers)Thomas de Lange (11 shared papers)Konstantin Pogorelov (11 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter T. Schmidt
127 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peter T. Schmidt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Gastroenterology 680
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 560
- Nutrition and Dietetics 423
- Oncology 605
- Surgery 848
Countries citing papers authored by Peter T. Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter T. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter T. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter T. Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter T. Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter T. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter T. Schmidt. The network helps show where Peter T. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter T. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KVASIR Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 407 |
| 2 | HyperKvasir, a comprehensive multi-class image and video dataset for gastrointestinal endoscopy Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 279 |
| 3 | 2006 | 239 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 132 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 123 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 120 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 108 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 104 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 98 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 92 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 77 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 70 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 68 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 62 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 50 |
About Peter T. Schmidt
Peter T. Schmidt is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology, Oncology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 132 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (18 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (17 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (11 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (10 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (9 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (8 papers) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (680 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (560 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (423 citations), Oncology (605 citations) and Surgery (848 citations). Peter T. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Jens J. Holst, Per M. Hellström, Erik Näslund, Per Grybäck, Michael A. Riegler, Sigrun Losada Eskeland, Thomas de Lange, Konstantin Pogorelov, Pål Halvorsen and Carsten Griwodz. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, Regulatory Peptides, Anticancer Research, Endoscopy and Journal of Clinical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.