O Benoît

2.7k citations
96 papers · 2.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

O Benoît

91 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

O Benoît
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 568
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 766
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 949
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 230
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 130
Replace Yvonne Harrison with:
Yvonne Harrison United Kingdom
Laura E. Martin United States
Neil Stanley United Kingdom
James E. Cox United States
Julian Lim Singapore
David W. Shucard United States
Gerben Meynen Netherlands
Fabio Ferlazzo Italy
Thomas V. Petros United States
Marco Fabbri Italy
O Benoît relative to Yvonne Harrison United Kingdom Yvonne Harrison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Yvonne Harrison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O Benoît

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O Benoît's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O Benoît with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O Benoît more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O Benoît

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O Benoît. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O Benoît. The network helps show where O Benoît may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O Benoît, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O Benoît Line = papers co-authored together O Benoît links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961221
2 2007219
3 1983163
4 1993103
5 1994100
6 200049
7 198248
8 196747
9 198643
10 197440
11 198239
12
Circadian aspects of motor activity in depressed patients.
198639
13 199138
14 200038
15 199037
16 198237
17 198036
18 198734
19 200033
20 199632

About O Benoît

O Benoît is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (35 papers), Sleep and related disorders (29 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (23 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (19 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (14 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (568 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (766 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (949 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (230 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (130 citations). O Benoît has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J. Foret, Chris Argyris, Agnès Daurat, Germán Barrionuevo, Robert W. McCarley, Jacques Prado, Sylvie Royant‐Parola, Christian Berthomier, Daniel Widlöcher and Pierre Berthomier. Their work appears in journals such as Neurophysiologie Clinique, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, SLEEP, Pediatric Research and Chronobiology International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact