Nathan Roth

3.0k citations
104 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Roth

89 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nathan Roth
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • General Psychology 53
  • Clinical Psychology 423
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 192
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 220
  • Philosophy 128
Replace Elizabeth Flanagan with:
Elizabeth Flanagan United States
Susan Johnson United States
Anthony Storr United Kingdom
Jean Hamilton United States
John Wallace United States
Andrew Gordon United States
Susan Schneider United States
Martha Davis United States
Martyn Pickersgill United Kingdom
Nathan Roth relative to Elizabeth Flanagan United States Elizabeth Flanagan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Elizabeth Flanagan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Roth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Roth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Roth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Roth. The network helps show where Nathan Roth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Roth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Roth Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Roth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995336
2 1975136
3 1990126
4 201567
5 197147
6 196642
7 197636
8 202033
9 201733
10 201733
11 202030
12 195630
13 201428
14 199625
15 202125
16 200124
17 201224
18 195721
19 200920
20 201120

About Nathan Roth

Nathan Roth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Hepatology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (10 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (6 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (6 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (5 papers) and Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (53 citations), Clinical Psychology (423 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (192 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations) and Philosophy (128 citations). Nathan Roth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R.E. Huber, Daniel Howes, Adam Szulewski, Albrecht Gröner, Wolfram Schäfer, Carlos Ros, Eleonora Widmer, Toby L. Simon, Juan I. Jorquera and Rodrigo Gajardo. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, Biologicals, American Journal of Psychotherapy, Biochemistry and Cell Biology and Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact