Max V. Birk

2.1k citations
70 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Max V. Birk

66 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Max V. Birk
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Human-Computer Interaction 437
  • Applied Psychology 275
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 520
  • Literature and Literary Theory 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 174
Replace Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin with:
Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin Taiwan
Adam Lobel Netherlands
Amy Shirong Lu United States
Mikko Salminen Finland
Penelope Sweetser Australia
Kimberly Burkhart United States
Bartholomäus Wissmath Switzerland
Jeanne Brockmyer United States
Erik D. van der Spek Netherlands
Simo Järvelä Finland
Max V. Birk relative to Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin Taiwan Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jih‐Hsuan Tammy Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max V. Birk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max V. Birk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max V. Birk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max V. Birk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max V. Birk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max V. Birk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max V. Birk. The network helps show where Max V. Birk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max V. Birk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max V. Birk Line = papers co-authored together Max V. Birk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016184
2 201491
3 201377
4 201455
5 201850
6 201549
7 201947
8 201747
9 201645
10 201842
11 201442
12 201742
13 201738
14 201835
15 201335
16 201632
17 201530
18 202228
19 201628
20 201624

About Max V. Birk

Max V. Birk is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (29 papers), Digital Games and Media (22 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers), Media Influence and Health (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers) and Flow Experience in Various Fields (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (437 citations), Applied Psychology (275 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (520 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (164 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (174 citations). Max V. Birk has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Regan L. Mandryk, Jason T. Bowey, Kathrin Gerling, Matthew K. Miller, Jan David Smeddinck, Maximilian A. Friehs, Nicola Baumann, Rita Orji, Scott Bateman and Ian J. Livingston. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders and interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact