Matthew E. Ansfield

1.0k citations
12 papers · 645 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew E. Ansfield

12 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Matthew E. Ansfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Social Psychology 311
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Clinical Psychology 220
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 197
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
Replace Karen Kate Kellum with:
Karen Kate Kellum United States
Nadja Heym United Kingdom
Tanya Vacharkulksemsuk United States
Quanshan Long China
Barclay Martin United States
Uffe Schjoedt Denmark
Wolfgang A. Rauch Germany
Karen Brans Belgium
Lynette Roberts Australia
André Gomez Australia
Matthew E. Ansfield relative to Karen Kate Kellum United States Karen Kate Kellum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Karen Kate Kellum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Ansfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Ansfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Ansfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Ansfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Ansfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Ansfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Ansfield. The network helps show where Matthew E. Ansfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Ansfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew E. Ansfield Line = papers co-authored together Matthew E. Ansfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2002154
2 1998107
3 199978
4 199671
5 200763
6 200457
7 200243
8
The feeling of doing.
199629
9 199617
10 199514
11 20156
12 20046

About Matthew E. Ansfield

Matthew E. Ansfield is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper) and Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (311 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (220 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations). Matthew E. Ansfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Wegner, Bella M. DePaulo, W. Robert Batsell, Gayla Y. Paschall, Alan S. Brown, Jennifer J. Tickle, Joseph M. Boden, Susan E. Kirkendol, Kathy L. Bell and Wendy L. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Appetite and Communication Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact