Matthew Bohm

2.4k citations
47 papers · 871 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Bohm

43 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Matthew Bohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Gastroenterology 192
  • Infectious Diseases 270
  • Rheumatology 118
  • Surgery 336
  • Aquatic Science 58
Replace Fulvia Milena Cribiù with:
Fulvia Milena Cribiù Italy
Ibrahim Masoodi Saudi Arabia
Antony Wettstein Australia
Mark P. Rondeau United States
Valentina Discepolo Italy
Signe Wildt Denmark
Andreas Koutsoumpas United Kingdom
Myron Brand United States
Yusuf Erzın Türkiye
Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme Italy
Matthew Bohm relative to Fulvia Milena Cribiù Italy Fulvia Milena Cribiù's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Fulvia Milena Cribiù · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Bohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Bohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Bohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Bohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Bohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Bohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Bohm. The network helps show where Matthew Bohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Bohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Bohm Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Bohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016146
2 201392
3 201867
4 200761
5 201158
6 201055
7 201854
8 202051
9 201137
10 200831
11
Fecal microbiota transplant in severe and severe-complicated Clostridium difficile: A promising treatment approach
201628
12 201921
13 201620
14 201919
15 202216
16 201814
17 201914
18 201711
19 202011
20 19979

About Matthew Bohm

Matthew Bohm is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Gastroenterology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (11 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (8 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (8 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (6 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Microscopic Colitis (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (192 citations), Infectious Diseases (270 citations), Rheumatology (118 citations), Surgery (336 citations) and Aquatic Science (58 citations). Matthew Bohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joel E. Richter, John M. Wo, Robert M. Siwiec, Monika Fischer, Nicholas Rogers, Huiping Xu, Zain Kassam, Emmalee Phelps, Yao‐Wen Cheng and Sashidhar Sagi. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Diseases of the Esophagus and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact