Mark Peter Whitehead
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Neutrino Physics Research
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 71
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 32
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 5
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 2
Mark Peter Whitehead
87 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Mark Peter Whitehead's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.7k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 15
- Mathematical Physics 7
- Geometry and Topology 6
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 18
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Peter Whitehead
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Peter Whitehead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Peter Whitehead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Peter Whitehead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Peter Whitehead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Peter Whitehead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Peter Whitehead. The network helps show where Mark Peter Whitehead may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 301 |
| 2 | Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark $${{{{{{\rm{T}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}^{+}$$ Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 267 |
| 3 | Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 225 |
| 4 | Search for A ′ → μ + μ − Decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 209 |
| 5 | Observation of X(3872) production in pp collisions at $\\sqrt{s}=7\\mbox{~TeV}$ | 2012 | 140 |
| 6 | 2013 | 133 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 99 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 88 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 75 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 14 | Opposite-side flavour tagging of B mesons at the LHCb experiment | 2012 | 47 |
| 15 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 33 |
About Mark Peter Whitehead
Mark Peter Whitehead is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (71 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (32 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (5 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.7k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (15 citations), Mathematical Physics (7 citations), Geometry and Topology (6 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (18 citations). Mark Peter Whitehead has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Russia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B, Physical review. D and Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.