Mark Barnes
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 22
- Physiology 17
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 16
- Co-authors
- Barbara E. Bierer (16 shared papers)Patrik S. Florencio (4 shared papers)Michael DiMaio (1 shared paper)Michael M. Johns (1 shared paper)Rebecca Li (3 shared papers)Ida Sim (1 shared paper)Michelle M. Mello (1 shared paper)Holly Fernandez Lynch (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (7 papers)KIVA (4 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)JAMA (3 papers)American Antiquity (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Barnes
71 papers receiving 865 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Health Informatics 35
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 341
- Medical Terminology 3
- Pharmacology 86
- Research and Theory 7
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Barnes. The network helps show where Mark Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 11 |
About Mark Barnes
Mark Barnes is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (22 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (16 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (35 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (341 citations), Medical Terminology (3 citations), Pharmacology (86 citations) and Research and Theory (7 citations). Mark Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara E. Bierer, Patrik S. Florencio, Michael DiMaio, Michael M. Johns, Rebecca Li, Ida Sim, Michelle M. Mello, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Erin Strumpf and Natalie Coyle. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, KIVA, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and American Antiquity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.