Magnus Westerlund
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Magnus Westerlund
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Magnus Westerlund. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Magnus Westerlund based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Magnus Westerlund. Magnus Westerlund is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Magnus Westerlund
12 papers receiving 108 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Magnus Westerlund
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Magnus Westerlund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Magnus Westerlund. The network helps show where Magnus Westerlund may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Magnus Westerlund
This map shows the geographic impact of Magnus Westerlund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Magnus Westerlund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magnus Westerlund more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.