M. Davier
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 9
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 3
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 3
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
-
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 3
- Journals
- Physical review. D (4 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. Davier
9 papers receiving 3.0k citations
M. Davier's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.2k
- Geophysics 304
- Oceanography 278
- Ocean Engineering 195
Countries citing papers authored by M. Davier
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Davier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Davier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Davier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Davier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Davier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Davier. The network helps show where M. Davier may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 2488 |
| 2 | Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO–Virgo Observing Run Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 149 |
| 3 | 2016 | 125 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 |
About M. Davier
M. Davier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geophysics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (3 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (3 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1 paper) and Geophysics and Sensor Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations), Geophysics (304 citations), Oceanography (278 citations) and Ocean Engineering (195 citations). M. Davier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.