Jonathan Gilmore

574 citations
24 papers · 215 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Gilmore

20 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Jonathan Gilmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 71
  • Philosophy 37
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 45
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 26
Replace Michael Ferber with:
Michael Ferber United States
Thiemo Breyer Germany
Rainer Strobl Austria
Rebecca Hill United States
Monique Plaza France
Massimo Fusillo United States
Ann C. Hodges United States
Paul Siegel United States
A Labad Spain
Bryce L. C. Becker United States
Jonathan Gilmore relative to Michael Ferber United States Michael Ferber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Michael Ferber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Gilmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Gilmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Gilmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Gilmore. The network helps show where Jonathan Gilmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Gilmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Gilmore Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Gilmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200762
2 200444
3 201120
4 201015
5 201110
6 20118
7 20018
8 20208
9 20147
10 20157
11 20146
12 20144
13
The Cosmopolitan Military: Armed Forces and Human Security in the 21st Century
20144
14 20242
15 20052
16 20022
17 20221
18 19951
19 20161
20 20171

About Jonathan Gilmore

Jonathan Gilmore is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Philosophy and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 24 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (71 citations), Philosophy (37 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (45 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (26 citations). Jonathan Gilmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brent Fedirchuk, Roy E. Hoffman, Maxine Varanko, Aaron L. Mishara, Jean-Marie Schaeffer and Steven Rendall. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, European Journal of International Relations, Law and Philosophy and International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact