Jonathan Denne

1.9k citations
30 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Denne

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jonathan Denne
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Statistics and Probability 390
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 507
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 267
  • Urology 92
  • Management Science and Operations Research 146
Replace Alun Bedding with:
Alun Bedding United Kingdom
Spencer Phillips Hey United States
Timothy M. Costigan United States
Rik de Greef United States
Dong‐Woo Kang United States
Elodie L. Plan Sweden
Tatiana Dilla Spain
Lynne Yao United States
Daniel Seigel United States
Xiaochun Li United States
Jonathan Denne relative to Alun Bedding United Kingdom Alun Bedding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Alun Bedding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Denne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Denne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Denne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Denne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Denne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Denne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Denne. The network helps show where Jonathan Denne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Denne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Denne Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Denne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011188
2 2004158
3 2004115
4 2003113
5 2003104
6 200690
7 200181
8 201178
9 200475
10 200369
11 199956
12 200030
13 199824
14 200223
15 200015
16 201412
17 20069
18 20038
19 20018
20 20137

About Jonathan Denne

Jonathan Denne is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Psychiatry and Mental health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (12 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (5 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (390 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (507 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (267 citations), Urology (92 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (146 citations). Jonathan Denne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gregory G. Enas, Ilya Lipkovich, Alex Dmitrienko, Christopher Jennison, Vivian Fonseca, A D Seftel, Paul Fredlund, William H. Cordell, Jacob Rajfer and Jeffrey T. Emmick. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, European Urology, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Biometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact