Jon Moline

9 papers and 69 indexed citations
i
.

About

Jon Moline is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Psychology and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Jon Moline has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 69 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in General Psychology and 1 paper in Law. Recurrent topics in Jon Moline’s work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). Jon Moline is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). Jon Moline collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jon Moline's co-authors include and and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Noûs and Mind.

In The Last Decade

No nodes

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Moline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Moline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Moline. The network helps show where Jon Moline may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Moline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Moline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Moline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Moline more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026