Johnathan Gutierrez

980 citations
40 papers · 639 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Johnathan Gutierrez

25 papers receiving 625 citations

Johnathan Gutierrez's Hit Papers

FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider 2019 · 446 citations
4460+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Johnathan Gutierrez
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 470
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 65
  • Aerospace Engineering 95
  • Radiation 32
  • Condensed Matter Physics 38
Replace D. Guadagnoli with:
D. Guadagnoli Switzerland
S. Redaelli Switzerland
Alice Moros Switzerland
Frolov A.Yu. Switzerland
B. Mele Switzerland
J. Gutleber Switzerland
S. Taroni Switzerland
R. Gupta Poland
D. Treille Switzerland
S. Masciocchi Switzerland
Johnathan Gutierrez relative to D. Guadagnoli Switzerland D. Guadagnoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
D. Guadagnoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johnathan Gutierrez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johnathan Gutierrez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johnathan Gutierrez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johnathan Gutierrez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johnathan Gutierrez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johnathan Gutierrez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johnathan Gutierrez. The network helps show where Johnathan Gutierrez may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider
Hit paper breakdown →
2019446
2 2019137
3 20256
4 20245
5 20244
6 20244
7 20254
8 20253
9 20243
10 20253
11 20252
12 20252
13 20252
14 20242
15 20252
16 20252
17 20252
18 20252
19 20251
20 20241

About Johnathan Gutierrez

Johnathan Gutierrez is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (31 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (27 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (10 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (2 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (470 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (65 citations), Aerospace Engineering (95 citations), Radiation (32 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (38 citations). Johnathan Gutierrez has collaborated with scholars based in China, Poland and Germany. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, Journal of High Energy Physics, The European Physical Journal Special Topics and Chinese Physics C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact