John R. Bowler

2.4k citations
87 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

John R. Bowler

87 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John R. Bowler
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.5k
  • Mechanics of Materials 882
  • Ocean Engineering 446
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 306
  • Metals and Alloys 32
Replace K. Miya with:
K. Miya Japan
Nobutomo Nakamura Japan
E. Kröner Germany
J.D.N. Cheeke Canada
Rodney Hill United Kingdom
R. deWit United States
Ekkehart Kr�ner Germany
J.‐P. Monchalin Canada
Yoshimi Hatsukade Japan
F. J. Margetan United States
John R. Bowler relative to K. Miya Japan K. Miya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
K. Miya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Bowler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Bowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Bowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Bowler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Bowler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Bowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Bowler. The network helps show where John R. Bowler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Bowler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John R. Bowler Line = papers co-authored together John R. Bowler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993130
2 1999115
3 1994106
4 199192
5
Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation
199985
6 200971
7 199762
8 200553
9 200552
10 200548
11 198946
12 199443
13 200541
14 198737
15 200636
16 199835
17 199734
18 201233
19 200630
20 200727

About John R. Bowler

John R. Bowler is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (73 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (29 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (23 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (20 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (19 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (15 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (11 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (1.5k citations), Mechanics of Materials (882 citations), Ocean Engineering (446 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (306 citations) and Metals and Alloys (32 citations). John R. Bowler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Theodoros Theodoulidis, Stephen J. Norton, L. David Sabbagh, H.A. Sabbagh, Nicola Bowler, M. J. Johnson, E. Ciampi, P. J. McDonald, Paul Glover and Yi Lü. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters and Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact