John Gardner
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 5
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 7
- Co-authors
- Andrew Webster (6 shared papers)Bernadette Hyland (1 shared paper)Ullrich K. H. Ecker (1 shared paper)Julie Leask (1 shared paper)Clare Williams (4 shared papers)Gabrielle Samuel (3 shared papers)Kerry O’Brien (4 shared papers)Adrian Carter (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Social Science & Medicine (4 papers)Sociology of Health & Illness (3 papers)International Journal of Drug Policy (3 papers)Regenerative Medicine (2 papers)Clinical Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Gardner
37 papers receiving 959 citations
John Gardner's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Communication 95
- Health Informatics 13
- Neurology 137
- Health 73
- Reproductive Medicine 71
Countries citing papers authored by John Gardner
This map shows the geographic impact of John Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gardner. The network helps show where John Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19 Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 274 |
| 2 | 2013 | 132 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 12 |
About John Gardner
John Gardner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Neurology, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (7 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (5 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (95 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations), Neurology (137 citations), Health (73 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (71 citations). John Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Webster, Bernadette Hyland, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Julie Leask, Clare Williams, Gabrielle Samuel, Kerry O’Brien, Adrian Carter, Narelle Warren and Alex Faulkner. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Sociology of Health & Illness, International Journal of Drug Policy, Regenerative Medicine and Clinical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.