Jane Lim
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 2
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
- Surgery 4
- Facial Trauma and Fracture Management 3
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 2
- Co-authors
- Wei Yan Ng (2 shared papers)Zhen Ling Teo (1 shared paper)Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran (1 shared paper)Daniel SW Ting (1 shared paper)Ting Fang Tan (1 shared paper)Yong Li (1 shared paper)C. H. Ang (1 shared paper)Ashvin Raju (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Eye and Vision (1 paper)Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (1 paper)Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Lim
7 papers receiving 222 citations
Jane Lim's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Health Informatics 14
- Rehabilitation 55
- Human-Computer Interaction 42
- Ophthalmology 45
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 50
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lim. The network helps show where Jane Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Metaverse and Virtual Health Care in Ophthalmology: Opportunities and Challenges Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 100 |
| 2 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 |
About Jane Lim
Jane Lim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Oral Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Rehabilitation (55 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations), Ophthalmology (45 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (50 citations). Jane Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wei Yan Ng, Zhen Ling Teo, Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran, Daniel SW Ting, Ting Fang Tan, Yong Li, C. H. Ang, Ashvin Raju, Thiam Chye Lim and Shabbir Moochhala. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye and Vision, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.