Jan Robert Kröger
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Robert Kröger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Robert Kröger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Robert Kröger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Robert Kröger. Jan Robert Kröger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jan Robert Kröger
24 papers receiving 378 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Robert Kröger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Robert Kröger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Robert Kröger. The network helps show where Jan Robert Kröger may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Robert Kröger
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Robert Kröger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Robert Kröger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Robert Kröger more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.