James Walder
Impact in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Neutrino Physics Research
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Papers in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 371
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 45
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 38
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 4
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 5
- Co-authors
- P. Denes (1 shared paper)Howard A. Padmore (1 shared paper)D. Doering (1 shared paper)Konstantin D. Stefanov (1 shared paper)Emanuele Mandelli (1 shared paper)K. Hanagaki (1 shared paper)G. S. Davies (1 shared paper)T.D. Wilkes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The European Physical Journal C (127 papers)Journal of High Energy Physics (125 papers)Physics Letters B (58 papers)Physical review. D (50 papers)Physical Review Letters (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Walder
434 papers receiving 17k citations
James Walder's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 19.7k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 99
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 186
- Instrumentation 17
- Radiation 54
Countries citing papers authored by James Walder
This map shows the geographic impact of James Walder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Walder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Walder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Walder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Walder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Walder. The network helps show where James Walder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Walder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 440 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015 Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 557 |
| 2 | Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton–proton collision data at $$\sqrt{s}$$ s =13 TeV Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 440 |
| 3 | Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1 Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 365 |
| 4 | Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb − 1 of proton-proton collision data at s = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 364 |
| 5 | Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in $$pp$$ p p collisions at $$\sqrt{s}=8$$ s = 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 362 |
| 6 | Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 269 |
| 7 | 2017 | 261 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 243 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 242 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 237 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 231 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 228 | |
| 13 | Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2 Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 219 |
| 14 | 2018 | 214 | |
| 15 | Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2 pp collision data set at $$\sqrt{s}=13$$ TeV Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 209 |
| 16 | Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in $$\sqrt{s}=13$$ $$\text {TeV}$$ pp collisions using the ATLAS detector Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 207 |
| 17 | 2018 | 203 | |
| 18 | Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at $$\sqrt{s}=13$$ TeV with the ATLAS detector Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 195 |
| 19 | 2018 | 193 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 181 |
About James Walder
James Walder is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 440 papers that have together received 20.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (371 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (45 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (38 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers) and CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (19.7k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (99 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (186 citations), Instrumentation (17 citations) and Radiation (54 citations). James Walder has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. Denes, Howard A. Padmore, D. Doering, Konstantin D. Stefanov, Emanuele Mandelli, K. Hanagaki, G. S. Davies, T.D. Wilkes, C. J. S. Damerell and Lakhdar Dehimi. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal C, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physics Letters B, Physical review. D and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.