James W. Brodsky

4.3k citations
96 papers · 3.1k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

James W. Brodsky

89 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

James W. Brodsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.1k
  • Rehabilitation 224
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 520
  • Occupational Therapy 83
  • Surgery 742
Replace John M. Schuberth with:
John M. Schuberth United States
Alan R. Catanzariti United States
Robert W. Mendicino United States
Mark S. Mizel United States
Alastair Younger Canada
John V. Vanore United States
David B. Thordarson United States
Jeffrey E. Johnson United States
Phinit Phisitkul United States
Carol Frey United States
James W. Brodsky relative to John M. Schuberth United States John M. Schuberth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John M. Schuberth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Brodsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Brodsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Brodsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Brodsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Brodsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Brodsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Brodsky. The network helps show where James W. Brodsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James W. Brodsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Brodsky Line = papers co-authored together James W. Brodsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009309
2 1999296
3 2002157
4 1998133
5 2013124
6 1993114
7 2005105
8 2014103
9 200787
10 200076
11 201176
12 201072
13 198857
14 201452
15 201450
16 200449
17 199949
18 198749
19 200646
20 201346

About James W. Brodsky

James W. Brodsky is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Rehabilitation, having authored 96 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (64 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (23 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (20 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (14 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2.1k citations), Rehabilitation (224 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (520 citations), Occupational Therapy (83 citations) and Surgery (742 citations). James W. Brodsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fabian E. Pollo, Scott Coleman, Shay Tenenbaum, John O. Krause, Andrew D. Beischer, Andrew Rouse, Brian S. Baum, Stephanie J. Crenshaw, Shay Shabat and Jason T. Bariteau. Their work appears in journals such as Foot & Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Clinics, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact