James Hoopes

26 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

James Hoopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • General Psychology 15
  • Literature and Literary Theory 131
  • Philosophy 94
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 38
  • History 79
Replace Jackson Lears with:
Jackson Lears United States
Elias Canetti United Kingdom
François Dosse France
David R. Shumway United States
Todd Presner United States
Ann Shukman United Kingdom
Ino Rossi United States
Eugene W. Holland United States
Sadie Plant Netherlands
Anne Tedeschi United States
James Hoopes relative to Jackson Lears United States Jackson Lears's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Jackson Lears · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hoopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hoopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hoopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hoopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hoopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hoopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hoopes. The network helps show where James Hoopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside James Hoopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hoopes Line = papers co-authored together James Hoopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Peirce on signs : writings on semiotic
1991226
2 1994128
3
Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce
201485
4 199238
5 198233
6 201429
7 199317
8 199914
9 197813
10 20008
11 20027
12 20025
13 19825
14 19905
15 19955
16 19774
17 19833
18
Sources for The New England mind: The seventeenth century
19813
19 19992
20 19912

About James Hoopes

James Hoopes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History, Education and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 35 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers), American History and Culture (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Management and Marketing Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (15 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (131 citations), Philosophy (94 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (38 citations) and History (79 citations). James Hoopes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Charles S. Peirce, Sacvan Bercovitch, Dorothy Ross, Bruce M. Stave, Mohar Yusof, Daniel J. Wilson, J. David Hoeveler, Kenneth Laine Ketner, John Henry Schlegel and Theodore Dwight Bozeman. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The New England Quarterly, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Management Decision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact