James Hoopes

1.4k citations
34 papers · 458 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Hoopes

25 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

James Hoopes
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • General Psychology 11
  • Philosophy 73
  • Literature and Literary Theory 61
  • History and Philosophy of Science 23
  • History 48
Replace Elias Canetti with:
Elias Canetti United Kingdom
François Dosse France
Todd Presner United States
Gabriel Tarde France
Ann Shukman United Kingdom
John S. Nelson United States
François Jullien France
Italo Calvino Italy
A. R. Louch United States
Amy Mandelker United States
James Hoopes relative to Elias Canetti United Kingdom Elias Canetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Elias Canetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Hoopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Hoopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hoopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hoopes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Hoopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hoopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hoopes. The network helps show where James Hoopes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside James Hoopes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Hoopes Line = papers co-authored together James Hoopes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Peirce on signs : writings on semiotic
1991179
2
Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce
201471
3 199235
4 199430
5 198228
6 201425
7 199316
8 199914
9 197810
10 20006
11 19825
12 19955
13 19774
14 20023
15 19833
16
Sources for The New England mind: The seventeenth century
19813
17 20023
18 19782
19 19912
20 19902

About James Hoopes

James Hoopes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History, Education and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 34 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (7 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (2 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Education Methods and Practices (1 paper), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper) and Accounting Education and Careers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), Philosophy (73 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations) and History (48 citations). James Hoopes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Charles S. Peirce, Dorothy Ross, Sacvan Bercovitch, Bruce M. Stave, Daniel J. Wilson, Mohar Yusof, J. David Hoeveler, Kenneth Laine Ketner, Stephen L. Collins and John Henry Schlegel. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The New England Quarterly, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Management Decision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact