James Dobson

33 papers receiving 985 citations

Peers

James Dobson
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Virology 435
  • Paleontology 404
  • Genetics 885
  • Insect Science 123
  • Global and Planetary Change 173
Replace Christina N. Zdenek with:
Christina N. Zdenek Australia
Nathan Dunstan Australia
Édgar Neri-Castro Mexico
Ivan Koludarov Australia
José Escolano Spain
Peter Mirtschin Australia
Camila Renjifo Australia
José A. Portes-Junior Brazil
Iwan Hendrikx Australia
Kenneth P. Wray United States
James Dobson relative to Christina N. Zdenek Australia Christina N. Zdenek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christina N. Zdenek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Dobson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Dobson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Dobson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Dobson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Dobson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Dobson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Dobson. The network helps show where James Dobson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Dobson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Dobson Line = papers co-authored together James Dobson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201887
2 201882
3 201777
4 201672
5 201871
6 201651
7 201743
8 201939
9 201839
10 201935
11 201733
12 201632
13 202030
14 202130
15 201426
16 201826
17 201925
18 201721
19 201821
20 201719

About James Dobson

James Dobson is a scholar working on Genetics, Virology, Paleontology, Global and Planetary Change and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (29 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (19 papers), Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (16 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (435 citations), Paleontology (404 citations), Genetics (885 citations), Insect Science (123 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (173 citations). James Dobson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bryan G. Fry, Christina N. Zdenek, Bianca op den Brouw, Nicholas J. Youngman, Jordan Debono, Luke Allen, Nathan Dunstan, Iwan Hendrikx, Amanda Nouwens and Timothy Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Toxins, Toxicology Letters, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Proteomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact