J. Chopier
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Gynecological conditions and treatments
Papers in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 22
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis 14
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging 11
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Émile Daraï (18 shared papers)Marc Bazot (3 shared papers)J.‐M. Antoine (1 shared paper)A. Cortez (1 shared paper)Isabelle Thomassin‐Naggara (22 shared papers)Martine Antoine (14 shared papers)Isabelle Trop (9 shared papers)Roman Rouzier (9 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
J. Chopier
49 papers receiving 903 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Reproductive Medicine 347
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 207
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 186
- Cancer Research 131
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 200
Countries citing papers authored by J. Chopier
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Chopier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Chopier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Chopier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Chopier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Chopier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Chopier. The network helps show where J. Chopier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Chopier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 376 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 10 |
About J. Chopier
J. Chopier is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 940 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (22 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (14 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (11 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (4 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (347 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (207 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (186 citations), Cancer Research (131 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (200 citations). J. Chopier has collaborated with scholars based in France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Émile Daraï, Marc Bazot, J.‐M. Antoine, A. Cortez, Isabelle Thomassin‐Naggara, Martine Antoine, Isabelle Trop, Roman Rouzier, S. Uzan and Marc Bazot. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, European Radiology, Clinical Radiology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.