Ines Lörcher

586 citations
12 papers · 270 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Communication and COVID-19 Impact
    • Journalism and Media Studies
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
    • Academic Publishing and Open Access

Papers in

Ines Lörcher

10 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Ines Lörcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Communication 96
  • Information Systems and Management 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 142
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 17
  • Health 16
Replace Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira with:
Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira Brazil
John Wihbey United States
Corinna Lüthje Germany
Fátima Espinoza Vasquez United States
Carlos Elías Spain
María Ángeles Chaparro Dominguez Spain
David Schieferdecker Germany
Wilson Ceron Brazil
Amalia Álvarez-Benjumea Germany
Raluca Cozma United States
Ines Lörcher relative to Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira Brazil Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Lörcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Lörcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Lörcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Lörcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Lörcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Lörcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Lörcher. The network helps show where Ines Lörcher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ines Lörcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Lörcher Line = papers co-authored together Ines Lörcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202090
2 201986
3 201742
4 201534
5 20197
6
"Let's talk about... CO2-Fußabdruck oder Klimawissenschaft?" Themen und ihre Bewertungen in der Onlinekommunikation in verschiedenen Öffentlichkeitsarenen
20154
7 20193
8 20192
9 20191
10 20241
11
Climate Change from the Audience Perspective
20160
12 20190

About Ines Lörcher

Ines Lörcher is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Information Systems and Management, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 12 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Communication and Perception (12 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (96 citations), Information Systems and Management (71 citations), Sociology and Political Science (142 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (17 citations) and Health (16 citations). Ines Lörcher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Brüggemann, Stefanie Walter, Monika Taddicken, Irene Neverla and Imke Hoppe. Their work appears in journals such as Public Understanding of Science, Media and Communication, Environmental Communication, Journal of Science Communication and Max Planck Digital Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact