Ines Färber

711 citations
18 papers · 462 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Färber

18 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Ines Färber
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Signal Processing 151
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 143
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Artificial Intelligence 323
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 164
Replace Bo Long with:
Bo Long United States
Anup Rao United States
Manjeet Rege United States
Andreas Lommatzsch Germany
David Fuhry United States
Xinyue Liu China
Xiaokai Wei United States
Károly Csalogány Hungary
Zhiping Zeng China
Joyce Jiyoung Whang South Korea
Ines Färber relative to Bo Long United States Bo Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Bo Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Färber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Färber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Färber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Färber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Färber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Färber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Färber. The network helps show where Ines Färber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ines Färber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Färber Line = papers co-authored together Ines Färber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201073
2
On Using Class-Labels in Evaluation of Clusterings
201069
3 201268
4 201243
5 201337
6 201133
7 200929
8 201223
9 201022
10 201321
11 201417
12 201210
13 20114
14 20104
15 20104
16
Visual Quality Assessment of Subspace Clusterings
20163
17
Efficient database techniques for identification with fuzzy vault templates
20111
18
Filtertechniken für geschützte biometrische Datenbanken.
20111

About Ines Färber

Ines Färber is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Information Systems and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (14 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (4 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (4 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (3 papers) and Biometric Identification and Security (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (151 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (143 citations), Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Artificial Intelligence (323 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (164 citations). Ines Färber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Seidl, Stephan Günnemann, Emmanuel Müller, Brigitte Boden, Andrada Tatu, Enrico Bertini, Daniel A. Keim, Tobias Schreck, Sebastian Raubach and Erich Schubert. Their work appears in journals such as Knowledge and Information Systems, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen), Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD and KOPS (University of Konstanz).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact