H. Schmidt

661 citations
40 papers · 550 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

H. Schmidt

37 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

H. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 321
  • Molecular Biology 352
  • Pharmacology 40
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 73
  • Developmental Neuroscience 13
Replace Nels C. Anderson with:
Nels C. Anderson United States
Yoshiaki Washizu United States
Bertil Hille United States
Frances M. Sansone United States
Hiroyuki Soeda Japan
P. T. A. Gray United Kingdom
S. F. Jones Australia
G Cota Mexico
J. G. Blackman New Zealand
H. Schmidt relative to Nels C. Anderson United States Nels C. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Nels C. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Schmidt. The network helps show where H. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside H. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together H. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197482
2 196870
3 196654
4 197637
5 197228
6 197627
7 197225
8 197719
9 197318
10 197718
11 197016
12 197915
13 197914
14 198714
15
[DEMONSTRATION OF DIFFERENT ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MOTOR AND SENSORY NERVE FIBERS IN THE FROG].
196414
16 196011
17 19758
18 19728
19 19878
20 19838

About H. Schmidt

H. Schmidt is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Genetics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (16 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers) and Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (321 citations), Molecular Biology (352 citations), Pharmacology (40 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (73 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (13 citations). H. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Elwys De Stefani, R. St�mpfli, H. P. Meissner, M. Siebler, Terrence Forrester, Jacques Lehouelleur, Peter Krippeit‐Drews, Tateki Kikuchi, Jacques Noireaud and W. Emser. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, The Journal of Physiology, The Journal of Membrane Biology, Brain Research and Archiv der Pharmazie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact