G. D. O’Dea
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 8
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 7
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 2
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 2
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 1
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters (3 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
G. D. O’Dea
8 papers receiving 6.3k citations
G. D. O’Dea's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 6.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.3k
- Oceanography 604
- Geophysics 562
- Instrumentation 81
Countries citing papers authored by G. D. O’Dea
This map shows the geographic impact of G. D. O’Dea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. D. O’Dea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. D. O’Dea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. D. O’Dea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. D. O’Dea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. D. O’Dea. The network helps show where G. D. O’Dea may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 2443 |
| 2 | GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 1499 |
| 3 | A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 894 |
| 4 | GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 881 |
| 5 | Tests of General Relativity with GW170817 Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 497 |
| 6 | 2017 | 167 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 61 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 40 |
About G. D. O’Dea
G. D. O’Dea is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Insect Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (7 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (2 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (1 paper), Magnetic confinement fusion research (1 paper) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (6.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.3k citations), Oceanography (604 citations), Geophysics (562 citations) and Instrumentation (81 citations). G. D. O’Dea has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Physical Review Letters, Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.