Fritz Ebert

645 citations
57 papers · 526 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Fritz Ebert

52 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Fritz Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Computational Mechanics 216
  • Ocean Engineering 94
  • Atmospheric Science 70
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 25
Replace Yoshiyuki Endo with:
Yoshiyuki Endo Japan
K. W. Lee South Korea
Fengxian Fan China
D.J. Holve United States
Thomas L. Hoffmann United States
Shaolin Mao United States
James A. Gieseke United States
Suhui Li China
Jayant S. Sabnis United States
S.H. Park South Korea
Fritz Ebert relative to Yoshiyuki Endo Japan Yoshiyuki Endo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Yoshiyuki Endo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fritz Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fritz Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fritz Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fritz Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fritz Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fritz Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fritz Ebert. The network helps show where Fritz Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Fritz Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fritz Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Fritz Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199590
2 200076
3 200576
4 199730
5 199825
6 199119
7 199617
8 198514
9 199514
10 199412
11 199211
12 19919
13 20029
14 19928
15 19807
16 19977
17 19987
18 20037
19 19956
20 19835

About Fritz Ebert

Fritz Ebert is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Atmospheric Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 57 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (25 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (21 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (16 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (10 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (8 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (5 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (216 citations), Ocean Engineering (94 citations), Atmospheric Science (70 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (25 citations). Fritz Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Steffen Heidenreich, Tibor János Goda, Uwe Vogt, Bernd A. Sachweh, Philipp Weiß, Tevfik Gemci, Heinz Umhauer, Samuel Schabel, Christine König and Madhukar C. Pandit. Their work appears in journals such as Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Journal of Aerosol Science, Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, Chemical Engineering & Technology and Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact