F. Lin

1.8k citations
18 papers · 53 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

F. Lin

13 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers

F. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 17
  • Aerospace Engineering 32
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 47
  • Biomedical Engineering 34
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 12
Replace Maja Olvegård with:
Maja Olvegård Sweden
C. M. Ginsburg United States
M. Korostelev United Kingdom
J. Dey United States
John Molendijk Switzerland
Stephen MacDonald United States
Joern Schaffran Germany
G. P. Goderre United States
K. Kahle Switzerland
Mateusz Wiencek Poland
F. Lin relative to Maja Olvegård Sweden Maja Olvegård's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maja Olvegård · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lin. The network helps show where F. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Lin Line = papers co-authored together F. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200717
2 20077
3 20145
4 20145
5 20054
6 20174
7 20162
8
AGS polarized proton operation in run 8.
20082
9
INCREASING THE AGS BEAM POLARIZATION WITH 80 TUNE JUMPS
20122
10 20061
11 20171
12
RECENT RHIC-MOTIVATED POLARIZED PROTON DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BROOKHAVEN AGS
20111
13 20131
14 20181
15 20220
16 20070
17 20060
18 20070

About F. Lin

F. Lin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (16 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (3 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (1 paper), Muon and positron interactions and applications (1 paper) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (17 citations), Aerospace Engineering (32 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (47 citations), Biomedical Engineering (34 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (12 citations). F. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include T. Roser, Ya. S. Derbenev, Kevin Brown, J.W. Glenn, M. Bai, A. Luccio, C. Gardner, H. Huang, M. A. Kondratenko and A. Zelenski. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters, Physics of Particles and Nuclei and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact