Emma Iserman

21 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Emma Iserman's Hit Papers

Interventions for enhancing medication adherence 2014 · 1.8k citations
1.8k0+4+8Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

Emma Iserman
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Family Practice 760
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 199
  • Applied Psychology 83
  • Safety Research 121
  • Gender Studies 133
Replace Joke Denekens with:
Joke Denekens Belgium
Gavin Daker‐White United Kingdom
Val Wass United Kingdom
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann United States
Karin Kjellgren Sweden
Lena Ring Sweden
Henry Mandin Canada
Summer L. Williams United States
John Spencer United Kingdom
Vanessa B. Sheppard United States
Emma Iserman relative to Joke Denekens Belgium Joke Denekens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Joke Denekens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Iserman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Iserman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Iserman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Iserman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Iserman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Iserman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Iserman. The network helps show where Emma Iserman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Iserman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Iserman Line = papers co-authored together Emma Iserman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Hit paper breakdown →
20141763
2 2009208
3 2003111
4 201266
5 201766
6 200859
7 201434
8 201232
9 202117
10 201411
11 20245
12 20145
13 20225
14 20095
15 20224
16 20212
17 20231
18 20131
19 20221
20 20201

About Emma Iserman

Emma Iserman is a scholar working on Hematology, Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Family Practice and Gender Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemophilia Treatment and Research (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (1 paper) and Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (760 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (199 citations), Applied Psychology (83 citations), Safety Research (121 citations) and Gender Studies (133 citations). Emma Iserman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include R. Brian Haynes, Rebecca Jeffery, Nancy L Wilczynski, Alfonso Iorio, Arun Keepanasseril, Thomas Agoritsas, Bhairavi Sivaramalingam, Tamara Navarro, Chris Cotoi and Nicholas Hobson. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Haemophilia and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact