Emma C. Fields

1.5k citations
93 papers · 951 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Emma C. Fields

84 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers

Emma C. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 271
  • Radiation 103
  • Reproductive Medicine 66
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 166
  • Oncology 188
Replace Firuza D. Patel with:
Firuza D. Patel India
Rosa Autorino Italy
Amelia Barcellini Italy
Lucas C. Mendez Canada
Kristin Bradley United States
Li‐Min Sun Taiwan
Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik Netherlands
I. Fumagalli France
Zachary D. Horne United States
C. Durdux France
Emma C. Fields relative to Firuza D. Patel India Firuza D. Patel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Firuza D. Patel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma C. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma C. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma C. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma C. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma C. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma C. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma C. Fields. The network helps show where Emma C. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma C. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma C. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Emma C. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020200
2 201897
3 201762
4 201342
5 201834
6 202034
7 201627
8 202026
9 201221
10 201018
11 202018
12 201918
13 202217
14 201817
15 202313
16 202313
17 201912
18 201812
19 202012
20 201812

About Emma C. Fields

Emma C. Fields is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Radiation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 93 papers that have together received 951 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (31 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (24 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (19 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers), Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (271 citations), Radiation (103 citations), Reproductive Medicine (66 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (166 citations) and Oncology (188 citations). Emma C. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lilie L. Lin, Sarah M. Temkin, Xiaoyan Deng, Bridget A. Quinn, Dorin Todor, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, William P. McGuire, Jori S. Carter, Jyoti Mayadev and Daniel G. Petereit. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Brachytherapy, Advances in Radiation Oncology, Practical Radiation Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact