Ellen Heck

1.5k citations
59 papers · 1.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Ellen Heck

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ellen Heck
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Rehabilitation 199
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 346
  • Epidemiology 262
  • Ophthalmology 65
  • Applied Mathematics 85
Replace M. Mack with:
M. Mack United States
Hiroshi Okamura Japan
Tamás Fülöp Hungary
James McGuire United States
J. L. Rodriguez United States
J. M. Bridges United States
Jerome Finkelstein United States
Samuel Jones United States
Douglas Jackson United Kingdom
M. Zuin Italy
Ellen Heck relative to M. Mack United States M. Mack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.1×
M. Mack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Heck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Heck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Heck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Heck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Heck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Heck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Heck. The network helps show where Ellen Heck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Heck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Heck Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Heck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985103
2 198669
3 199967
4 199852
5 197451
6 197649
7 199649
8 200947
9 199445
10
Stimulated nitroblue tetrazolium test to assess neutrophil antibacterial function: prediction of wound sepsis in burned patients.
197341
11
Neuromuscular problems in the burn patient: cause and prevention.
198541
12 199938
13 198034
14 199531
15 199129
16 198728
17 197528
18 199428
19 198126
20 197425

About Ellen Heck

Ellen Heck is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Rehabilitation, Applied Mathematics, Epidemiology and Radiation, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (9 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (9 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (8 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (6 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (4 papers) and Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (199 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (346 citations), Epidemiology (262 citations), Ophthalmology (65 citations) and Applied Mathematics (85 citations). Ellen Heck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A S Dickinson, Charles R. Baxter, P. William Curreri, Paul R. Bergstresser, Velisa Vesovic, D. R. Flower, Jim Williams, Phala A. Helm, John L. Hunt and Janet A. Marvin. Their work appears in journals such as Cornea, Molecular Physics, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact