E. Clay

57 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

E. Clay
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
  • Health 22
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 18
  • Epidemiology 83
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34
Replace Mohammad Sarif Mohiuddin with:
Mohammad Sarif Mohiuddin United States
Raissa T Derckx Netherlands
Tianyan Hu United States
Birgit Teufer Austria
Jae Hong Joo South Korea
Aparna Das United States
Tianming Zhao China
Kelly Bell United States
Maria A. Parker United States
Jessica L. Rohmann Germany
E. Clay relative to Mohammad Sarif Mohiuddin United States Mohammad Sarif Mohiuddin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.5×
Mohammad Sarif Mohiuddin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Clay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Clay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Clay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Clay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Clay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Clay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Clay. The network helps show where E. Clay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Clay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Clay Line = papers co-authored together E. Clay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202359
2 201854
3 201252
4 201946
5 201645
6 201925
7 201722
8 201421
9 201215
10 201714
11 201813
12 201413
13 201612
14 202011
15 202110
16 201910
17 201810
18 202310
19 20129
20 20139

About E. Clay

E. Clay is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (4 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations), Health (22 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (18 citations), Epidemiology (83 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (34 citations). E. Clay has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mondher Toumi, A. Millier, Pierre Lévy, Nicholas Moore, Samuel Aballéa, Bruno Falissard, Nathalie Largeron, C. François, M. Uhart and Hélène Bricout. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Medical Economics, BMC Public Health, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics and ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact