David Newbold
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 10%
- Nursing education and management
- Family Practice top 10%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Papers in
-
- Second Language Learning and Teaching 14
-
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 8
- Co-authors
- Li M. Li (1 shared paper)Julia Roberts (1 shared paper)Li Li (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Nursing Management (6 papers)Journal of Clinical Nursing (1 paper)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)International Journal of Nursing Practice (1 paper)Nursing Standard (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyIndia
In The Last Decade
David Newbold
33 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Research and Theory 18
- Family Practice 18
- Emergency Medical Services 55
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
- Health Information Management 28
Countries citing papers authored by David Newbold
This map shows the geographic impact of David Newbold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Newbold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Newbold more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Newbold
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Newbold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Newbold. The network helps show where David Newbold may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Newbold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 184 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 4 | Ability grouping, the Banbury enquiry | 1977 | 23 |
| 5 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 7 | An evaluation of the role of the nurse practitioner. | 1996 | 11 |
| 8 | The value of male nurses in maternity care. | 1985 | 11 |
| 9 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | The Epistemological Nature of Language Teaching Methodology | 2006 | 4 |
| 15 | Computing. Deciding data. | 1994 | 3 |
| 16 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About David Newbold
David Newbold is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Linguistics and Language, having authored 40 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (14 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (5 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Health Services Management and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (18 citations), Family Practice (18 citations), Emergency Medical Services (55 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations) and Health Information Management (28 citations). David Newbold has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and India. Frequent co-authors include Li M. Li, Julia Roberts and Li Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Clinical Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Nursing Practice and Nursing Standard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.