Dana Gioia

14 papers and 61 indexed citations i.

About

Dana Gioia is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Industrial relations and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana Gioia has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 61 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory, 0 papers in Industrial relations and 0 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Dana Gioia’s work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). Dana Gioia is often cited by papers focused on Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). Dana Gioia collaborates with scholars based in and . Dana Gioia's co-authors include John Boening and has published in prestigious journals such as American Literature, World Literature Today and The Antioch Review.

In The Last Decade

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Gioia i

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Gioia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Gioia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Gioia. The network helps show where Dana Gioia may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Gioia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Gioia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Gioia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Gioia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025