D. Scalia

1.1k citations
13 papers · 945 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

D. Scalia

13 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

D. Scalia
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 531
  • Animal Science and Zoology 442
  • Small Animals 200
  • Immunology 249
  • Aquatic Science 58
Replace B.T.T.M. van Rens with:
B.T.T.M. van Rens Netherlands
R.R. Peters United States
W. F. Pope United States
Miki Sakatani Japan
Andrea Verini Supplizi Italy
Ulrich Baulain Germany
Marie-Pierre Sanchez France
Marie Saint‐Dizier France
P. Sartorelli Italy
J.I. Leenhouwers Netherlands
D. Scalia relative to B.T.T.M. van Rens Netherlands B.T.T.M. van Rens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5.0×
B.T.T.M. van Rens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Scalia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Scalia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Scalia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Scalia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Scalia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Scalia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Scalia. The network helps show where D. Scalia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside D. Scalia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Scalia Line = papers co-authored together D. Scalia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006166
2 2005159
3 2006157
4 2004105
5 2005103
6 199674
7 199944
8 200142
9 199733
10 200231
11 200715
12 200214
13
Subclinical ketosis affects protective value of sheep colostrum and passive immunisation of lambs
20012

About D. Scalia

D. Scalia is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Aquatic Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (5 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers) and Heat shock proteins research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (531 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (442 citations), Small Animals (200 citations), Immunology (249 citations) and Aquatic Science (58 citations). D. Scalia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Lacetera, U. Bernabucci, A. Nardone, Bruno Ronchi, Loredana Basiricò, P. Morera, Luc Duchateau, Christian Burvenich, M. Mazzini and Kristel Demeyere. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, American Journal of Veterinary Research, International Journal of Biometeorology, Polar Biology and Aquaculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact