Bimal Nepal

63 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Bimal Nepal
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Management Information Systems 603
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 347
  • Strategy and Management 629
  • Management Science and Operations Research 272
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 214
Replace Eric Rebentisch with:
Eric Rebentisch United States
Santosh B. Rane India
Shamsuddin Ahmed Malaysia
Fernando Antônio Forcellini Brazil
Josef Oehmen Denmark
Stuart Chambers United Kingdom
Nadia Bhuiyan Canada
Sandeep Grover India
Milind Akarte India
Ahmet Beşkese Türkiye
Bimal Nepal relative to Eric Rebentisch United States Eric Rebentisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Eric Rebentisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bimal Nepal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bimal Nepal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bimal Nepal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bimal Nepal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bimal Nepal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bimal Nepal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bimal Nepal. The network helps show where Bimal Nepal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bimal Nepal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bimal Nepal Line = papers co-authored together Bimal Nepal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017115
2 2015102
3 201798
4 201098
5 201193
6 201366
7 201764
8 201561
9 200453
10 201148
11 201146
12 201735
13 200732
14 201032
15 201329
16 200727
17 201126
18 201126
19 201824
20 200623

About Bimal Nepal

Bimal Nepal is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Media Technology and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (18 papers), Product Development and Customization (14 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (12 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (8 papers), Quality Function Deployment in Product Design (7 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (6 papers) and Quality and Management Systems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (603 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (347 citations), Strategy and Management (629 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (272 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (214 citations). Bimal Nepal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Om Prakash Yadav, Leslie Monplaisir, Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, Rakesh Jain, Avinash Panwar, Alper Murat, Michael Johnson, Nanua Singh, Andrew C. Lyons and Rajesh Solanki. Their work appears in journals such as Engineering Management Journal, International Journal of Production Economics, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Quality Engineering and Quality and Reliability Engineering International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact