B. C. Smith

507 citations
47 papers · 354 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

B. C. Smith

38 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

B. C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Public Administration 59
  • Urban Studies 56
  • Political Science and International Relations 167
  • Finance 37
  • Development 13
Replace Dilys M. Hill with:
Dilys M. Hill United Kingdom
Paul Schumaker United States
Gregory Albo Canada
Emma Clarence United Kingdom
Dale Rogers Marshall United States
Nicholas Awortwi Netherlands
Thomas Kaplan United States
Josh Pacewicz United States
Jim Buller United Kingdom
Pete Burgess United Kingdom
B. C. Smith relative to Dilys M. Hill United Kingdom Dilys M. Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Dilys M. Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. C. Smith. The network helps show where B. C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside B. C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together B. C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200066
2 199733
3 199832
4 199826
5 199622
6 200016
7 197915
8 202413
9 198113
10 199813
11 198112
12 19829
13 19838
14
Hands, not lands: John Locke, Immigration and the ‘Great Art of Government’
20187
15
Field administration : an aspect of decentralisation
19677
16 20086
17 20236
18 19866
19 19985
20 20154

About B. C. Smith

B. C. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (8 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers), European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (59 citations), Urban Studies (56 citations), Political Science and International Relations (167 citations), Finance (37 citations) and Development (13 citations). B. C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ján Buček, Marshall W. Meyer, Allen H. Barton, Andrew Dunsire, Paul Collins, Hal G. Rainey, Christopher Hood, Douglas Pitt, Donald P. Warwick and Herbert Kaufman. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration and Development, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Public Administration, Public Administration Review and The Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact