Anna Poma

59 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anna Poma
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 114
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 180
  • Analytical Chemistry 109
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
Replace Markus Schröder with:
Markus Schröder Germany
Curtis S. Fullmer United States
Lewis B. Kinter United States
Hafedh Abdelmelek Tunisia
Matthew Baxter United Kingdom
R. Kovačević Serbia
Zuzanna Setkowicz Poland
Yuko Doi Japan
Yanjie Sun United States
Anna Poma relative to Markus Schröder Germany Markus Schröder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Markus Schröder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Poma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Poma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Poma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Poma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Poma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Poma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Poma. The network helps show where Anna Poma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Poma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Poma Line = papers co-authored together Anna Poma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013143
2 2011141
3 1997104
4 201297
5 199969
6 200763
7 200650
8 201537
9 200835
10 201534
11 200031
12 199631
13 199929
14 199226
15 200326
16 200424
17 200621
18 201420
19 198818
20 200217

About Anna Poma

Anna Poma is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology, Plant Science and Biotechnology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (11 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (10 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (9 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (6 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Heavy Metals in Plants (4 papers) and Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (114 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (180 citations), Analytical Chemistry (109 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations). Anna Poma has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Russia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include S. Santucci, Anna Maria Ragnelli, Michele Miranda, Alfredo Costa, Giuseppe Chichiriccò, Pierpaolo Aimola, Sebastiano Di Bucchianico, Giuseppe Carlucci, Giuseppe Nappi and Laura Spanò. Their work appears in journals such as Microscopy Research and Technique, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Mutagenesis, Melanoma Research and Journal of Microscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact