Andrew Weil

84 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Andrew Weil's Hit Papers

Clinical and Psychological Effects of Marihuana in Man 1968 · 342 citations
3420+19+38Years since publication100200300

Peers

Andrew Weil
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 457
  • Toxicology 113
  • Pharmacology 446
  • Clinical Psychology 503
  • Oceanography 227
Replace Mark Moss with:
Mark Moss United Kingdom
John Eagles United Kingdom
Hartej Gill Canada
Fredi Kronenberg United States
Robert Smith United States
Angela J. Dean Australia
Gilbert W. Fellingham United States
Elizabeth Evans United States
Holger Hoffmann Germany
Richard Weisman United States
Andrew Weil relative to Mark Moss United Kingdom Mark Moss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37.8×
Mark Moss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Weil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Weil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Weil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Weil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Weil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Weil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Weil. The network helps show where Andrew Weil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Weil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Weil Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Weil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Clinical and Psychological Effects of Marihuana in Man
Hit paper breakdown →
1968342
2 1984242
3 2002225
4 1998187
5 2002104
6
The natural mind
1972103
7 199992
8 197088
9 199480
10 200278
11 196961
12
The Natural Mind - A New Way of Looking at Drugs and the Higher Consciousness
197359
13 202151
14 196549
15 201246
16 202042
17 200041
18 200040
19
Health and Healing
198340
20 200633

About Andrew Weil

Andrew Weil is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (15 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (13 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (9 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (457 citations), Toxicology (113 citations), Pharmacology (446 citations), Clinical Psychology (503 citations) and Oceanography (227 citations). Andrew Weil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Norman E. Zinberg, Judith M. Nelsen, Victoria Maizes, Iris R. Bell, Ralph Snyderman, Tracy Gaudet, Opher Caspi, David Rychener, Amram Eshel and Sven Beer. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, New England Journal of Medicine, Nature and Journal of Psychoactive Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact