Andrew Field

4.1k citations
85 papers · 2.2k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 8
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 6
    • Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment 7

Andrew Field

79 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Andrew Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Parasitology 465
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 331
  • Oncology 402
  • Cancer Research 191
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 330
Replace Cécile Pautas with:
Cécile Pautas France
A Galian France
Jianbing Ding China
William Krüger Germany
Yoshito Eizuru Japan
Tsieh Sun United States
Casilda G. Black Australia
Mónica G. Chiaramonte United States
Akihiko Okayama Japan
Yong Cheng China
Andrew Field relative to Cécile Pautas France Cécile Pautas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Cécile Pautas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Field. The network helps show where Andrew Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Field Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998221
2
Cyclin D1 protein is overexpressed in hyperplasia and intraductal carcinoma of the breast.
1998117
3 200388
4 198385
5 200577
6 201977
7 202074
8 199673
9 201572
10 201566
11 200261
12 199661
13 201658
14 199557
15 201954
16 199349
17 201948
18 201145
19 201243
20 202235

About Andrew Field

Andrew Field is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (14 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (13 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (465 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (331 citations), Oncology (402 citations), Cancer Research (191 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (330 citations). Andrew Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Marriott, David A. Cooper, Andrew Carr, Michael Hing, E Vasak, Wendy A. Raymond, Philippe Vielh, Fernando Schmitt, R. Sutherland and Susan M. Henshall. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Cytologica, Diagnostic Cytopathology, Cancer Cytopathology, Pathology and Cytopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact