Ainārs Stepens

25 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Ainārs Stepens
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Toxicology 47
  • Occupational Therapy 37
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 74
  • Neurology 55
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 69
Replace Nathalie Pross with:
Nathalie Pross Switzerland
Katrin Sikk Estonia
Phoebe Um United States
Ho Yeong Kil South Korea
K.‐G. Petersen Germany
Sara Pompanin Italy
Kazem Ghaemi Iran
Marcello Ávila Mascarenhas Brazil
Steve Ampah United States
Giulia Vinceti Italy
Ainārs Stepens relative to Nathalie Pross Switzerland Nathalie Pross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Nathalie Pross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ainārs Stepens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ainārs Stepens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ainārs Stepens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ainārs Stepens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ainārs Stepens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ainārs Stepens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ainārs Stepens. The network helps show where Ainārs Stepens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ainārs Stepens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ainārs Stepens Line = papers co-authored together Ainārs Stepens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008152
2 202146
3 201037
4 201326
5 201613
6 202013
7 20228
8 20247
9 20214
10 20164
11 20192
12 20212
13 20202
14 20182
15 20172
16 20162
17 20231
18 20251
19 20171
20 20231

About Ainārs Stepens

Ainārs Stepens is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 32 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (47 citations), Occupational Therapy (37 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (74 citations), Neurology (55 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (69 citations). Ainārs Stepens has collaborated with scholars based in Latvia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ardis Platkājis, Michael Donaghy, Pauls Aldiņš, Inese Mārtiņsone, Ināra Logina, Baiba Rozentāle, Heidi Johansen‐Berg, Charlotte J. Stagg, Marie‐Hélène Boudrias and Thomas Karakolis. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychology, European Journal of Neuroscience and Brain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact