Ainārs Stepens

28 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Ainārs Stepens
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Toxicology 72
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 101
  • Occupational Therapy 45
  • Neurology 85
  • Neurology 17
Replace Richard B. Lazar with:
Richard B. Lazar United States
Katrin Sikk Estonia
Seigo Nakano Japan
Sevim Baybaş Türkiye
Mohammad Reza Najafi Iran
Pierpaolo Turcano United States
Joe Fred Smith Jr. United States
Wen‐Yu Hsu Taiwan
Sun‐Wung Hsieh Taiwan
Cristina Paci Italy
Ainārs Stepens relative to Richard B. Lazar United States Richard B. Lazar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Richard B. Lazar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ainārs Stepens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ainārs Stepens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ainārs Stepens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ainārs Stepens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ainārs Stepens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ainārs Stepens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ainārs Stepens. The network helps show where Ainārs Stepens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ainārs Stepens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ainārs Stepens Line = papers co-authored together Ainārs Stepens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008159
2 202152
3 201038
4 201329
5 201614
6 202014
7 20169
8 20229
9 20248
10 20215
11 20164
12 20162
13 20172
14 20192
15 20202
16 20212
17 20232
18 20232
19
PAPER: Development of the Pathological Personality Trait Scales for the Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory (LCPI v2.2)
20161
20 20171

About Ainārs Stepens

Ainārs Stepens is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Applied Psychology, Occupational Therapy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (4 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (72 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (101 citations), Occupational Therapy (45 citations), Neurology (85 citations) and Neurology (17 citations). Ainārs Stepens has collaborated with scholars based in Latvia, United Kingdom and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Ardis Platkājis, Michael Donaghy, Inese Mārtiņsone, Pauls Aldiņš, Ināra Logina, Baiba Rozentāle, Charlotte Jane Stagg, Heidi Johansen‐Berg, Sara Mondini and Vedran Hadžić. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, European Journal of Neurology, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact