A. Cammers‐Goodwin
Impact in
-
- Crystallography and molecular interactions
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Papers in
-
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 3
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 2
-
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas J. Allen (1 shared paper)D. S. KEMP (1 shared paper)Kim F. McClure (1 shared paper)Craig A. Grimes (1 shared paper)Jing Chen (1 shared paper)Christopher Martin (2 shared papers)Mark Wurth (1 shared paper)Dibakar Bhattacharyya (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (4 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (4 papers)European Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Membrane Science (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
A. Cammers‐Goodwin
14 papers receiving 577 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 51
- Organic Chemistry 157
- Spectroscopy 84
- Molecular Biology 291
- Pharmaceutical Science 25
Countries citing papers authored by A. Cammers‐Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Cammers‐Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Cammers‐Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Cammers‐Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Cammers‐Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Cammers‐Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Cammers‐Goodwin. The network helps show where A. Cammers‐Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside A. Cammers‐Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 225 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 2 |
About A. Cammers‐Goodwin
A. Cammers‐Goodwin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (2 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (51 citations), Organic Chemistry (157 citations), Spectroscopy (84 citations), Molecular Biology (291 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (25 citations). A. Cammers‐Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Allen, D. S. KEMP, Kim F. McClure, Craig A. Grimes, Jing Chen, Christopher Martin, Mark Wurth, Dibakar Bhattacharyya, Edwin Vedējs and Alan Dozier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Membrane Science and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.