Geoenvironmental Disasters

283 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 283 papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters usually cover Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (150 papers), Global and Planetary Change (99 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (97 papers) specifically the topics of Landslides and related hazards (145 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (70 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geoenvironmental Disasters are Matebie Meten, Fawu Wang, Ryuichi Yatabe, Azemeraw Wubalem, Christopher Gomez, Ogbonnaya Igwe, Netra Prakash Bhandary, Tarun Kumar Raghuvanshi, Heather Purdie and Ahmed Barakat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters.

Countries where authors publish in Geoenvironmental Disasters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geoenvironmental Disasters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geoenvironmental Disasters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoenvironmental Disasters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025