Cuadernos de Economía

234 papers and 580 indexed citations i.

About

The 234 papers published in Cuadernos de Economía in the last decades have received a total of 580 indexed citations. Papers published in Cuadernos de Economía usually cover Economics and Econometrics (143 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (94 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (65 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Policy (70 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (57 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cuadernos de Economía are María Verónica Alderete, Carlos Dabús, Ignacio Vélez–Pareja, Leopoldo Fergusson, José Antonio Ocampo, Solveig Richter, Ricardo Ffrench‐Davis, Alex Coad, Gerardo Bocco and David Díaz Díaz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cuadernos de Economía

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cuadernos de Economía. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cuadernos de Economía.

Countries where authors publish in Cuadernos de Economía

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cuadernos de Economía. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cuadernos de Economía with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cuadernos de Economía more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025