Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

267.7k citations
6.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 293
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 340
    • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism 279

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

6.0k papers receiving 261.4k citations

Peers

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Physiology 49.9k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 12.5k
  • Neurology 13.9k
  • Molecular Biology 116.0k
  • Biological Psychiatry 3.9k
Replace Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity with:
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity China
Antioxidants and Redox Signaling United States
Advances in experimental medicine and biology United States
Redox Biology China
Cells United States
Frontiers in Physiology United States
Diabetologia United States
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research United States
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease relative to Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity China Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease.

About Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

The 6.3k papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease in the last decades have received a total of 267.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease usually cover Clinical Biochemistry (442 papers), Physiology (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (3.3k papers), Cell Biology (666 papers) and Cancer Research (549 papers) specifically the topics of Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (565 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (340 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (293 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (279 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (242 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (215 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (191 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease are P. Hemachandra Reddy, Eui‐Ju Choi, Eun-Kyung Kim, Louise C. Serpell, George Perry, Jon Goerke, Russell H. Swerdlow, Lars Ernster, Gustav Dallner and D. Allan Butterfield.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact