Washington Department of Natural Resources

14.5k citations
532 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Washington Department of Natural Resources

489 papers receiving 13.9k citations

Peers

Washington Department of Natural Resources
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 6.1k
  • Ecology 5.8k
  • Ecological Modeling 602
  • Oceanography 1.4k
Replace Washington State Department of Ecology with:
Washington State Department of Ecology United States
Tula Foundation Canada
Vancouver Aquarium Canada
Hakai Institute Canada
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality United States
Conservation Biology Institute United States
California Water Science Center United States
John Muir Health United States
World Water Watch United States
Klamath Community College United States
Washington Department of Natural Resources relative to Washington State Department of Ecology United States Washington State Department of Ecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Washington State Department of Ecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Washington Department of Natural Resources

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Washington Department of Natural Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Washington Department of Natural Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Washington Department of Natural Resources more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Washington Department of Natural Resources

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Washington Department of Natural Resources at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Washington Department of Natural Resources at the time of their publication.

About Washington Department of Natural Resources

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Washington Department of Natural Resources have published 532 papers, which have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 174 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 212 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 209 papers in Ecology, 25 papers in Ecological Modeling and 65 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (91 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (66 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (65 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (50 papers), Marine and fisheries research (50 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (46 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (40 papers) and Forest ecology and management (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.1k citations), Ecology (5.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (602 citations) and Oceanography (1.4k citations). Authors at Washington Department of Natural Resources collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Ecosphere, PLoS ONE and Ecological Applications. Some of Washington Department of Natural Resources's most productive authors include Daniel C. Donato, Brian J. Harvey, Monica G. Turner, Martín Hall, Dayton L. Alverson, Gregory T. Ruggerone, Carl J. Cederholm, Fritzi S. Grevstad, Jerry F. Franklin and Jesse Trushenski.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact